This was from a new study on environmental health burden which are done on estimates based on some model of real data of similar circumstance (not exact cause who can measure direct cause due to shipping emissions related illness?), and extrapolated out. It was probably not wise to put all those significant digits as shown below, which was why I rounded it in the headline since I felt it was interesting enough to show the relative and approximate values, but not the exact values put out below for your information because no study can hope to be so precise. I’ve had the opportunity to investigate other similar studies at work so I know, but didn’t blog them to avoid conflict of interesting using work time, and money to purchase studies in some cases, for my personal blog.
The wide range showed the weakness of the study models, although the range is a good indicator of the magnitude of the problem to demonstrate there to be a problem. These statistical models based on some associated evidence have a range of confidence level so the right answer is like in that range. It’s just too bad that range couldn’t be narrower. But the fact the number is in that range and the magnitude of the range is known are the important things here, not the specifics of the numbers.
With the shipping industry pollution having gotten a lot of attention just recently, other shipping pollution statistics can be found on this blog in Stats 0474, 0471, 0470, 0468 and 0175.
Corbett, Winebrake, and colleagues estimated seafaring-ship emissions of PM2.5 and other pollutants, including sulfate and NOx. Using global circulation models combined with a variety of emissions scenarios, they mapped out how emissions would drift over land. After folding in regional demographic data, they could pinpoint areas with a higher likelihood of deaths from cardiopulmonary and lung cancer that are attributable to PM2.5 exposure.
Depending on the scenarios and models used, the number of such premature deaths in 2002 ranged from about 19,000 to 64,000. Southeast Asia, India, and Europe bore the brunt of the mortality along coastlines and near ports, but inland France also saw high mortality rates due to atmospheric circulation patterns and population density, the models show. Without emissions controls, the number of premature deaths could increase by 40% in the next 5 years, the authors estimate.
The reported range of deaths “reflects a lot of the uncertainties in the original mortality studies” on particulate matter exposure and its effects, comments Bart Ostro, chief of the Air Pollution Epidemiology Section of the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Ostro modeled health effects for the port city of Long Beach with higher-resolution models, the results of which the researchers use for comparison. He says that their assumptions and model results seem “reasonably robust.” Ostro also notes that mortality rates hint at the hidden damage from shipping emissions, including asthma and other problems, which contribute to higher costs for health care and the economy due to lost work and wages.
Observers from within the shipping industry and elsewhere argue that the current emissions controls established by IMO are sufficient to cap spewing sulfate, and that more stringent rules, called for by environmental groups and others, would create heavy cost burdens for shipping companies. Corbett and Winebrake reported further modeling results in a paper coauthored with Chengfeng Wang of the University of Delaware, published in ES&T (DOI: 10.1021/es070812w), in which they argue that measures for controlling sulfur emissions could be more cost-effective than previously assumed. Using emissions data from international oceangoing ships making port in the U.S., they calculate that low-sulfur fuels, onboard scrubbers, and market-based emissions trading programs could save up to $260 million in costs for achieving controls targets.
——————————————
The study correlates the global distribution of particulate matter—black carbon, sulfur, nitrogen and organic particles—released from ships’ smoke stacks with heart disease and lung cancer mortalities in adults. Under current regulation, and with the expected growth in shipping activity, it estimates the annual mortalities from ship emissions could increase by 40% by 2012.
Annual deaths related to shipping emissions in Europe are estimated at 26,710, while the mortality rate is 19,870 in East Asia and 9,950 in South Asia. North America has approximately 5,000 premature deaths, concentrated mostly in the Gulf Coast region, the West Coast and the Northeast, while the eastern coast of South America has 790 mortalities. Highest value tally distribution. [Envirostats author]
Ships run on residual oil, which has sulfur content thousands of times greater than on-road diesel fuel. “Residual oil is a byproduct of the refinery process and tends to be much dirtier than other petroleum products,” Winebrake says.
“We needed to know what the benefits are of cleaning up this fuel,” he explains. “Now we can evaluate the human health impacts of policies to require low-sulfur fuels for the shipping industry or that require ships to put emissions control technology on their vessels. Our study will help inform this policy debate.”
Up until recently, researchers had little information with which to work; emissions data for marine vessels had to be linked with data tracking the movement of these vessels around the world. In their report, Corbett and Winebrake mapped marine pollution concentrations over the oceans and on land, estimating global and regional mortalities from ship emissions by integrating global ship inventories, atmospheric models and health impacts analyses.
The focus on long-term exposure to particulate matter in this study does not extend to impacts on children or other related health issues such as respiratory disease, asthma, hospital emissions and the economic impact of missed workdays and lost productivity.
“Our work will help people decide at what scale action should be taken,” says Corbett, associate professor of marine policy at University of Delaware. “We want our analysis to enable richer dialogue among stakeholders about how to improve the environment and economic performance of our freight systems.”
- “Mortality from Ship Emissions: A Global Assessment” by James Corbett of University of Delaware and James Winebrake from Rochester Institute of Technology, scheduled to appear in the Dec. 15 issue of Environmental Science & Technology, the journal of the American Chemical Society, via Science Daily and Environmental Science & Technology, Nov 7 2007